Download the latest version of adobe acrobat reader from adobes web site. Asarco files bankruptcy reorganization plan tucson, az tucson based asarco llc asarco announced that it is filing today a plan of reorganization with the u. Update 2bankrupt asarco asks court to set bid process. Delaware bankruptcy courts foreclose creative attempts to distinguish asarco. A federal appeals court has ruled that tucsonbased asarco must pay out millions to union workers in copperprice bonuses. The district court held that asarco was judicially estopped from pursuing its claim because of representations it made to a bankruptcy court concerning its settlement agreement with the epa for the site in question. Asarco ruling continues to rankle bankruptcy practitioners. Asarco and amc can obtain this information in the same way that idaho and prg did, by examining asarcos own records. The department of justice and asarco filed five settlement agreement with the united states bankruptcy court for the southern district of texas corpus christi division on march, 2009. Manual part b, development of riskbased preliminary. This account holds money from court orders or settlements, and. Asarco can hardly consider itself vindicated after the entry of the consent decree filing no.
Union pacific slams asarcos filing in basin cleanup row law360. District judge of the western district of texas, sitting by designation. Asarco did not challenge the arbitrators findings of fact or conclusions of law, but argued that the noadd provision. The court finds that the documents asarco and amc want are work product, and that neither party has shown the requisite hardship in order to obtain them. Aguilar later filed her own suit, alleging sexual harassment under title vii. Mcnamee this week issued a decision to enforce an arbitrators award that asarco pay a negotiated quarterly bonus based on the price of copper to the hundreds of employees hired after june 30, 2011, that. Notice of asarco llc asbestos personal injury settlement trust filing deadlines the asarco trust provides this notice to alert claimants counsel to the provisions of section 5. The ninth circuit issued an opinion on june 19, 2018, app. They can be viewed, and printed, with the use of an adobe acrobat reader. It does not appear that the district court ever granted any motion associated with that filing, nor does it appear that amc ever answered, however. Asarco originally filed the current case against union pacific in arizona district court.
Although the district court ultimately reversed the bankruptcy court, it noted that it is difficult to evaluate prosnaxs reasoning for the hindsight test and that many other courts rejected the fifth circuits approach. Bankruptcy court in corpus christi, tx yesterday under bankruptcy rule 9019 seeking the court s approval to enter into five settlement. Case 0521207 document 10541 filed in txsb on 039 page 3 of 45 whereas, the state of washington has alleged that asarco is a potentially responsible party with respect to the tacoma site. Union pacific then moved to transfer or dismiss the case. Arizona nrd final settlement arizona department of environmental. On august 9, 2005, asarco filed for reorganization under chapter 11 of the bankruptcy code in the united states bankruptcy court for the southern district of texas, corpus christi division.
Consent to the filing of amicus curiae briefs, in support of either party or of neither party, received from counsel for the petitioners. Whereas, the united states and the state each filed proofs of claim in the asarco. Upon receipt of a claim form in paper or pdf format. The plan implements the previouslyannounced sale of asarcos operating assets to. Consent decree and settlement agreement of state of texas. As relevant here, the court held that the firms could recover fees for defending their fee application. Oct 25, 2018 filing 10 service executed filed by asarco llc. Tucsonbased asarco llc must pay out millions to union workers in copperprice bonuses, the 9th us circuit court of appeals ruled 19 june. Bankruptcy court in the southern district of texas. The department of justice and asarco filed the settlement agreement with the united. Filing 17 motion to sever pursuant to frcp 21 andor motion to dismiss or stay pursuant to the firsttofile rule andor this courts inherent authority to manage its own docket by asarco llc, asarco llc union employee benefits plan. Asarco appealed various aspects of the award to the district court. The department of justice and asarco filed the settlement agreement with the united states bankruptcy court for the southern district of texas corpus christi division on march, 2009. The district court found that statement inconsistent with asarcos subsequent contribution claim, because cercla allows for contribution only to the extent a party has paid more than its fair share.
United states court of appeals fifth circuit f i l e d december 11, 2012. Guide for online filing describes the process for establishment of a claim file. Pittsburgh the united steelworkers usw today said that senior u. Whereas, on april 11, 2005, several of asarcos whollyowned direct or indirect subsidiaries the asbestos subsidiary debtors1 filed their voluntary petitions in this court. Brief amici curiae of bankruptcy law scholars filed. Therefore, the bankruptcy court found that professional fees are not to be judged in hindsight. Whereas, asarco filed with the united states bankruptcy court for the southern. Whereas, the united states has alleged that it has incurred past response costs, and will incur additional future response costs under the comprehensive environmental. Wmi was a savings and loan holding company, which owned washington mutual bank wmb. Asarco subsidiaries file chapter 11 proceedings tucson, arizona asarco llc asarco announced today that five nonoperating and dormant subsidiaries of asarco have filed chapter 11 proceedings in bankruptcy court in corpus christi, texas as part of a strategy to invoke special provisions of the bankruptcy code. Federal court orders asarco to pay wrongfully withheld bonuses.
Bankruptcy court presid ing over asarco llcs pending chapter 11 reorganization today approved a settlement agreement between. For the courts complete choiceoflaw analysis, see asarco llc v. Wtiereas, asarco filed with the united states bankruptcy court for the southern district of texas a voluntary petition for relief under title 11 of the united states bankruptcy code on august 9, 2005 the asarco bankruptcy case. Asarco must pay copper bonuses to union workers, court rules.
Therefore, while at issue in the initial stages of these proceedings, all choiceoflaw matters were resolved by agreement by the time of trial. Union pacific slams asarcos filing in basin cleanup row. Delaware bankruptcy courts foreclose creative attempts to. Asarco llc files a 9019 motion for court approval of its global environmental settlements tucson, az asarco llc filed a motion with the u. The court approved the settlement agreement on june 5, 2009. Oct 25, 2018 filing 17 motion to sever pursuant to frcp 21 andor motion to dismiss or stay pursuant to the firsttofile rule andor this court s inherent authority to manage its own docket by asarco llc, asarco llc union employee benefits plan. Asarco gets supreme court extension to appeal ruling on employee. Filed united states court of appeals for the fifth circuit.
Summons and complaint and notice of consent to exercise of jurisdiction by magistrate judge upon local unions 88602, 915 and 5252 united steelworkers of america, aflcioclc on 1112018. Tucsonbased copper producer asarco llc has won more time to file an appeal with the u. Feb 05, 2008 update 2bankrupt asarco asks court to set bid process. The court of appeals for the fifth circuit reversed. December 12, 2006, three more asarco subsidiaries the 2006 subsidiary debtors3 filed similar petitions for relief with this court. Bankruptcy court presid ing over asarco llcs pending chapter 11 reorganization today approved a. The plan implements the previouslyannounced sale of asarco s operating assets to sterlite. Brief amicus curiae of the state bar of texas bankruptcy law section filed. Jun 21, 2018 tucsonbased asarco llc must pay out millions to union workers in copperprice bonuses, the 9th us circuit court of appeals ruled 19 june. Asarcos bankruptcy filing was precipitated by a mounting. Superior court against asarco on behalf of aguilar and the state. Whereas, the united states and the state each filed proofs of. Asarco filed a petition to vacate arbitration award in the united states district court for the district of arizona.
The users guide for online filing is available on the trusts website at paper or pdf filing 21. The plan implements the previouslyannounced sale of asarcos operating assets to sterlite. District of texas a voluntary petition for relief under title 11 of the united. Asarco, in which the court ruled that professionals that are paid from a debtors bankruptcy estate cannot be compensated for time spent defending their fee applications, continues to rankle. Before failing, wmb 1 this opinion constitutes the findings of fact and conclusions of law of the court pursuant to rule 7052 of the. Asarco, then controlled by a company the two law firms successfully sued during the course of the bankruptcy cases, objected. Asarco emerged from bankruptcy, the law firms filed fee applica tions requesting fees under 330a1, which permits bankruptcy courts to.
Prior to the filing of its chapter 11 petition, washington mutual, inc. A split threejudge panel of the san franciscobased. The tenth circuit reversed the district courts dismissal of asarcos cercla claim, holding that the two positions could be reconciled. The idaho supreme court reinstated its previous opinion in a brief per curiam order on march 4, 1981. Asarco must pay copper bonuses, appeals court rules. On appeal to the district court, asarco abandoned its. Debbie nadler 602 9776593 court approves asarco buyback of mission mill tucson, az february 28, 2007 the u. Nov 22, 2016 the department of justice and asarco filed five settlement agreement with the united states bankruptcy court for the southern district of texas corpus christi division on march, 2009. The arizona district court held a hearing and thereafter transferred the case to the district of.
1333 467 1116 963 644 426 1166 989 1097 538 73 919 352 823 77 502 532 990 511 429 1405 60 1508 69 429 864 200 205 454 787 1493 1273 955 1432 213 562 1 1428 1245 1118 700